top of page
Search

Smart Cities & Urban Heat in Australia: Part 1: The New Climate Reality - A 2020–2025 Literature Review


1. Introduction

Australia is entering another summer marked by record-breaking heatwaves, rapidly rising mean temperatures, and heightened bushfire risk. Since 2020, the frequency, duration, and intensity of extreme heat events have accelerated, with the Bureau of Meteorology noting that the last decade was the hottest on record and that extreme-heat days now occur three times more often than in the 1960s.


Across the eastern states and ACT, December–February heatwaves are already producing measurable impacts:


Increased hospital admissions during prolonged nighttime heat

Energy grid instability from sustained cooling loads

Localised “heat pockets” in dense suburbs

Elevated bushfire fuel dryness and early ignition risk

Higher PM2.5 levels from prolonged atmospheric stagnation


This context makes urban heat not just an environmental issue — but a public health, infrastructure, and economic resilience problem. Smart cities, equipped with IoT sensors, predictive modelling, and geospatial analytics, now play a central role in understanding and mitigating these risks.


This article revisits my 2020 literature review and expands it with post-2020 research, updated climate models, new sensor technologies, and data-driven approaches that define the modern smart-city response.


2. Literature Review (2020–2025 Update)

2.1 Urban Heat Island (UHI) Intensification

Recent studies show that UHI intensity in Australian cities has worsened due to:


  • Higher urban density

  • Loss of canopy cover from drought and development

  • Heat-retaining building materials

  • Reduced nighttime cooling due to humidity shifts


Sydney and Melbourne now report 2.5–4°C higher nighttime temperatures in dense suburbs compared to outer regions. Canberra, despite green space, has shown steep increases in surface heat, particularly in industrial areas and new residential developments.


2.2 Smart City Technologies for Heat Monitoring


Post-2020 smart-city deployments increasingly use:


  • IoT microclimate sensors (temp, humidity, particulate matter)

  • Satellite thermal imagery (Landsat 8, Sentinel-3)

  • Drone-based thermal mapping for suburban heat pockets

  • Edge-computing nodes processing real-time environmental data

  • Citizen-sensor networks via wearables and smartphones


Cities like Brisbane, Wellington, Seoul, and Singapore are now integrating dense sensor grids that forecast heat distress and energy demand at the street scale.


2.3 AI, Digital Twins, and Predictive Modelling

The biggest shift since 2020 has been the adoption of AI-powered urban digital twins, allowing for:


  • Simulation of heat dispersion

  • Forecasting energy loads

  • Testing the impact of greenery or building materials

  • Predictive bushfire-smoke infiltration scenarios

  • Emissions and air-quality heat-wave correlations


Australia is still emerging in this area, but Sydney, ACT, Melbourne and Gold Coast councils have begun establishing early-stage digital-twin frameworks.


2.4 Urban Morphology and Heat Exposure

Recent research confirms the relationship between urban form and heat:


  • High-rise clusters produce “heat canyons”

  • Black asphalt raises local surface temps by up to 12–18°C

  • Low-canopy suburbs record the highest heat-related hospital admissions

  • Water bodies and permeability reduce nighttime heat retention


These findings support the shift toward “cool urban design” policies adopted by many councils between 2022–2025.


3. Emerging Technology Trends (2020–2025)

3.1 Real-Time Heat Analytics

Advances include:


  • Continuous thermal imaging (AI-enhanced)

  • ML-driven prediction of heat stress levels

  • Sensor fusion from IoT + satellite + ground observations

  • Automated shade and irrigation systems based on temperature thresholds


Cities like Dubai, Singapore, and Barcelona have already implemented ML-driven heat-response systems; Australia is testing pilots.


3.2 Community Heat-Risk Profiling

Using data science, councils now generate:


  • Vulnerability indices

  • Suburb-level risk layers

  • Demographic x environmental blended models

  • Prioritised cooling interventions


These models consider population age, dwelling type, urban density, and access to cooling infrastructure.


4. Australia’s Situation (2020–2025)

4.1 Heatwave Trends

BOM data indicates:


  • Heatwaves now start earlier and last longer

  • High nighttime temperatures prevent body recovery

  • Consecutive “severe heatwave days” increasing by ~20–30% per decade

  • Wet-bulb temperatures in some regions rising to dangerous thresholds


4.2 Bushfires & Heat Interaction

CSIRO and AFAC report a growing correlation between:


  • Heatwaves

  • Dry lightning events

  • Fuel dryness

  • Early ignition in peri-urban regions


Bushfire smoke further traps heat and increases PM2.5 levels, amplifying vulnerability.


4.3 Urban-Policy Shifts

Since 2020, multiple states have adopted:


  • Urban tree-canopy targets (ACT: 40% by 2045)

  • Heat-resilient building material policies

  • Heatwave and smoke early-warning systems

  • Smart-city funding streams for environmental sensors


However, implementation remains inconsistent and fragmented.


5. Gaps in Current Approaches

Despite advances, Australia faces major limitations:


  • Fragmented sensor networks between councils

  • Minimal cross-agency data governance

  • Slow adoption of digital twins

  • Lack of open, real-time environmental data APIs

  • Green-infrastructure plans not scaling fast enough

  • Poor integration between planning, climate science, and IoT engineering


These gaps create blind spots that reduce our ability to predict, respond, and adapt effectively.


6. Conclusion

Between 2020 and 2025, urban heat has transformed from a planning consideration into a critical climate-resilience and public-health priority. Smart-city technologies, AI, geospatial analytics, and microclimate modelling now provide tools Australia urgently needs — but adoption remains uneven.


📚 Academic References (2020–2025)

Australian & Government Sources

Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). (2023). Annual Climate Statement 2023. Australian Government. Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). (2024). State of the Climate 2024. CSIRO & Bureau of Meteorology. (2023). State of the Climate: Long-term Projections for Australia. CSIRO. (2024). Climate Resilience and Extreme Heat in Urban Australia. AFAC (Australasian Fire Authorities Council). (2023). Bushfire Seasonal Outlook 2023–24. NSW Department of Planning. (2022). Urban Heat Planning Toolkit. ACT Government. (2023). Canberra Urban Forest Strategy: 2023–45.


Peer-Reviewed Scientific Sources

Arbolino, R., De Simone, L., & Carlucci, F. (2023). Smart cities, environmental quality and urban heat vulnerability.Sustainable Cities and Society, 93, 104540.


Azhdari, A., Soltani, A., & Alidadi, M. (2020). Urban morphology and microclimate: A comprehensive review on UHI mechanisms. Urban Climate, 34, 100676.


Chapman, S., Thatcher, M., Salim, D., & Ren, Z. (2022). Heatwave characteristics in Australian cities under projected warming. Nature Climate Change, 12, 932–941.


Estrada, F., Botzen, W., & Tol, R. (2021). Economic losses from heatwaves in developed urban environments. Science of The Total Environment, 778, 146331.


Jandaghian, Z., & Akbari, H. (2021). Cooling urban heat islands: Strategies and global case studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146, 111196.


Milojevic-Dupont, N., et al. (2022). Urban heat island amplification under climate change. Nature Communications, 13, 7621.


Mousavi, C. (2020). Smart Cities & Urban Heat: Literature Review. Queensland University of Technology.


Rahman, M. A., et al. (2023). Tree canopy, evapotranspiration, and heat mitigation in urban Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 230, 104619.


Saaroni, H. et al. (2021). Outdoor thermal comfort: Trends, modelling techniques and future directions. Urban Climate, 37, 100841.


Stone, B., Vargo, J., & Habeeb, D. (2021). Projected heat-related mortality in cities. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 064051.


Wang, Y., Akbari, H., & Lantz, K. (2024). Satellite-based high-resolution thermal analytics for urban heat islands.Remote Sensing of Environment, 295, 113767.


Smart City & Technology Sources

Cai, Y., et al. (2023). AI-driven digital twins for climate-resilient cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 101, 101942.


Haque, U., et al. (2022). IoT-based urban climate sensors and microclimate monitoring networks. Sensors, 22(4), 1489.


Mohajeri, N., Gudmundsson, A., & Scartezzini, J.-L. (2021). Urban form and energy demand under extreme heat conditions. Applied Energy, 303, 117637.


Ramaswami, A., et al. (2022). Urban systems science for climate adaptation. PNAS, 119(13), e2116269119.


Bushfire & Heat Interaction Sources

Dowdy, A. (2020). Climatological variation of fire weather in Australia. Journal of Applied Meteorology & Climatology, 59(3), 349–367.


Sharples, J., et al. (2022). Heatwave–bushfire interactions and dynamic risk modelling. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 31(5), 557–570.


Urban Planning & Policy Sources

Newton, P., & Taylor, M. (2022). Transitioning Australian cities: Resilience, digitalisation and climate adaptation.Australian Planner, 59(1), 1–16.


Thompson, S., & Tapper, N. (2023). Urban heat risk governance in Australia: Emerging frameworks and policy gaps.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(8), 1400–1418.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page